Stewart Postharvest Review

An international journal for reviews in postharvest biology and technology

© 2011 Stewart Postharvest Solutions (UK) Ltd.                                                                                                  

Online ISSN:1945-9656

www.stewartpostharvest.com                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Online ISSN:1945-9656

www.stewartpostharvest.com  © 2005 Stewart Postharvest Solutions (UK) Ltd.

 All Rights Reserved 1

 

Heat treatment of grain-processing facilities for insect management: a historical overview and recent advances

 

 

Bhadriraju Subramanyam1*, Rizana Mahroof2 and Monika Brijwani1

1Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA

2 Department of Biological Sciences, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, South Carolina, USA

 

 

 

Abstract

Purpose of review: Tactics to manage infestations of stored-product insects in grain-processing facilities historically included the use of heat treatments and the fumigant methyl bromide. The phase out of methyl bromide in the USA in 2005, because of its adverse effects on stratospheric ozone, has renewed interest in using heat treatments. In this review, a brief history regarding the use of heat treatments in grain-processing facilities, such as flour mills, is described along with recent research developments and future research needs.

Findings: Scientific literature published during the last decade shed new light on the following areas: identification of a heat-tolerant stage of a species based on stage-specific susceptibility at different constant elevated temperatures; differences in susceptibility among stored-product insect species to elevated temperatures; confusion in determining a heat-tolerant stage during commercial heat treatments of grain-processing facilities; impact of sanitation on insect responses; degree and duration of insect suppression obtained following a heat treatment intervention; development and validation of a thermal death kinetic model to predict survival of heat-tolerant insect life stages as a function of time-dependent temperature data; and development of software programs to estimate the heat energy required including costs of a heat treatment based on fuel used and predicting survival of heat-tolerant insect stages in “real time” during heat treatments.

Directions for future research: Temperature-time mortality relationships have been developed for a few economically important insect species and additional species should be evaluated in both laboratory and field conditions. Very little is understood about the impact of the lethal and sub-lethal elevated temperatures used during heat treatments on insect behaviour and reproduction. The cost-effectiveness of combining elevated temperatures with other chemical or nonchemical methods in grain-processing facilities also should be explored.

 

Keywords: methyl bromide alternative; heat treatment; insect responses; efficacy assessment; models; software programs

 

*Correspondence to: Bhadriraju Subramanyam, Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA. Tel: +1 785 532 4092; Fax: +1 785 532 7010; email: sbhadrir@k-state.edu

 

Stewart Postharvest Review 2011, 3:1

Published online 01 December 2011

doi: 10.2212/spr.2011.3.1